Comics Bulletin logo
Search
  • Columns
    Random
    • Putting Drama in Superhero MMOs

      Kelvin Green
      December 12, 2011
      Columns, Mission Professional
    Recent
    • What Looks Good For the Week of December 4, 2019

      Daniel Gehen
      December 2, 2019
    • What Looks Good for the Week of November 20th 2019

      Daniel Gehen
      November 19, 2019
    • The Full Run: FINAL CRISIS – SUBMIT

      Daniel Gehen, Jason Jeffords Jr.
      November 15, 2019
    • What Looks Good
    • Comics Bulletin Soapbox
    • The Full Run
    • Leading Question
    • Top 10
    • The Long-Form
    • Jumping On
    • Comics in Color
    • Slouches Towards Comics
  • Big Two
    Random
    • What Looks Good for 12/16/15: DC and Marvel

      Kelvin Green
      December 14, 2015
      Big Two, What Looks Good
    Recent
    • Collecting Profile: DC Stargirl

      nguyen ly
      November 30, 2019
    • Collecting Profile: The Eternals

      nguyen ly
      November 16, 2019
    • The Full Run: FINAL CRISIS – SUBMIT

      Daniel Gehen, Jason Jeffords Jr.
      November 15, 2019
    • DC Comics
    • Big Two Reviews
    • Marvel Comics
  • Indie
    Random
    • Singles Going Steady 10/12/2016: Is This Real (After)life, Or Is This Just Fantasy?

      Kelvin Green
      October 15, 2016
      Image, Indie, Reviews, Singles Going Steady, Valiant
    Recent
    • Review: Transformers Galaxies #3 and the problem with Constructicons

      Stephen Cook
      December 3, 2019
    • AHOY Comics Announces A Wave of Titles for 2020

      Daniel Gehen
      November 12, 2019
    • What Looks Good for the Week of November 13th, 2019

      Daniel Gehen
      November 11, 2019
    • Reviews
    • Archie Comics
    • Boom! Studios
    • Dark Horse
    • IDW
    • Image
    • Oni Press
  • Reviews
    Random
    • 5.0

      Doctor Who #16

      Kelvin Green
      October 23, 2010
      Reviews
    Recent
    • 2.0

      Review: Roku #1 Fails to Deliver

      Jason Jeffords Jr.
      November 11, 2019
    • 3.5

      Review: AMAZING MARY JANE #1 Starts Strong But Plays it Safe With Messaging

      Daniel Gehen
      October 29, 2019
    • 4.0

      Review: Count Crowley – Reluctant Midnight Monster Hunter #1

      Mike Nickells
      October 22, 2019
    • Singles Going Steady
    • Slugfest
    • Manga
      • Reviews
    • Small Press
      • Reviews
      • ICYMI
      • Tiny Pages Made of Ashes
  • Interviews
    Random
    • Chris J. Cole: A Look Inside the Pages of April's Le Tout Burlesque

      Kelvin Green
      December 29, 2009
      Interviews
    Recent
    • Interview: V.E. Schwab on revisiting Red London in The Steel Prince

      Stephen Cook
      March 13, 2019
    • Interview: David Foster Wallace and Hellblazer, words on Wyrd with writer Curt Pires

      Stephen Cook
      February 27, 2019
    • “The Night Has Teeth” An Interview with Sarah deLaine, Artist of Image Comics’ “Little Girls”

      Jason Sacks
      February 26, 2019
    • Audio Interview
    • Video Interview
  • Classic Comics
    Random
    • A Page from Daredevil #193

      Kelvin Green
      March 9, 2014
      Classic Comics Cavalcade, Columns
    Recent
    • Countdown to the King: Marvel’s Godzilla

      Daniel Gehen
      May 29, 2019
    • Honoring A Legend: Fantagraphics To Resurrect Tomi Ungerer Classics

      Daniel Gehen
      February 15, 2019
    • Reliving the Craziest Decade in Comics History: An interview with Jason Sacks

      Mark Stack
      January 2, 2019
    • Classic Comics Cavalcade
    • Classic Interviews
  • News
    Random
    • Kickstarter Spotlight: End of Days: Scorched Earth

      Kelvin Green
      March 20, 2015
      Kickstarter Spotlight, News
    Recent
    • AHOY Comics Announces A Wave of Titles for 2020

      Daniel Gehen
      November 12, 2019
    • Valiant’s BLOODSHOT Trailer is Finally Here

      Daniel Gehen
      October 21, 2019
    • The Rafaels Team-Up for “HIDDEN SOCIETY”

      Daniel Gehen
      October 3, 2019
    • Titan to Release Phantom of the Opera GN

      Daniel Gehen
      October 1, 2019
    • GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS Title Awarded to Todd McFarlane for SPAWN

      Daniel Gehen
      September 30, 2019
    • Jim Shooter Brings SLOW CITY BLUES to IMAGE

      Daniel Gehen
      September 24, 2019
  • Books
    Random
    • 5.0

      RED ROSA: A Graphic Biography of Rosa Luxemburg

      Kelvin Green
      October 26, 2015
      Books, Reviews
    Recent
    • Collecting Profile: Disney Frozen

      nguyen ly
      November 22, 2019
    • Collecting Profile: NFL Superpro

      nguyen ly
      August 31, 2019
    • “THE BEST OF WITZEND” is a Wonderful Celebration of Artistic Freedom

      Daniel Gehen
      September 15, 2018
    • Review: ‘Machete Squad’ is a Disappointing Afghan Memoir

      Jason Sacks
      July 31, 2018
    • Review: ‘Out of Nothing’ is the Antidote to Our Sick Times

      Jason Sacks
      July 23, 2018
    • Review: ‘Bizarre Romance’ Shows Rough Edges in the Early Days of a New Marriage

      Jason Sacks
      July 10, 2018
What's New
  • Review: Transformers Galaxies #3 and the problem with Constructicons
  • What Looks Good For the Week of December 4, 2019
  • Collecting Profile: DC Stargirl
  • Collecting Profile: Disney Frozen
  • What Looks Good for the Week of November 20th 2019
  • Collector’s corner: Old school long box diving for comics is still fun
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Contact Us
  • Write for us!
  • Visit Video Game Break!
Home
Reviews

The Hollow Crown – Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part 1

Kelvin Green
July 14, 2012
Reviews

Paul Brian McCoy: After last week's glorious launch of the BBC's The Hollow Crown with Richard II, this week we are plunged into the darker and more direct movement of Henry IV, Part One. This play covers the years 1402 and 1403 in King Henry's reign and things are not well in England.

Henry's trip to Jerusalem has been postponed due to an outbreak of rebellions and the play opens with news that Henry Percy has just won a decisive battle but refuses to turn over his prisoners to the king.

Kelvin Green: Dark is the right word for it. The contrast in visuals between this and last week's Richard II was striking.

Everything was cold and grey, and it set a wintry tone, befitting a kingdom in decline.

The only colour we really saw was the drab red Hal wore throughout.

Paul: True. There's not a lot of levity here, which is kind of odd for the play that introduced the world to Falstaff.

Kelvin: Indeed. He wasn't the riotous laugh one might expect from the character, as this was a very dark adaptation, but I wonder if that makes the character's relative levity all the more effective.

He's surrounded by all the blood, mud and shit, and so that creates a contrast.

I'm not sure if it worked like that, but that may have been what they were going for.

Paul: Perhaps. I'm pretty sure that was the intent, anyway. It didn't really work that well for me.

Especially after seeing some clips of the stage performance in the Shakespeare Uncovered episode that aired that same night. On stage the comedy is played up and in just a few short clips, I was laughing out loud. Here, not so much.

Kelvin: I thought it worked well enough in the context of the TV movie, but there are some expectations of Falstaff and yes, this portrayal ran counter to them in places.

Paul: There also seemed to be more pronounced hostility behind the interactions of Prince Hal and Falstaff here than I was expecting.

Kelvin: Yes, I noticed that too. More emphasis was placed on Hal's attempts to belittle and embarrass Falstaff, and Falstaff showed definite contempt for the prince on occasion.

It's there in the text, I suppose, but it's not a common interpretation.

Paul: Yes. As we talked about a bit last week, the text really does leave things up to the interpretation of the actors and the director. After seeing Tom Hiddleston talk a little about how he saw Hal, I'm wondering if his interpretation and the director's weren't working at cross purposes.

For example, Hiddleston said he didn't think Hal had his eventual betrayal of Falstaff planned and that he really was affectionate toward the fat man, but Richard Eyre's direction really emphasizes Hal's Machiavellian intents from the start and dwells on the negative aspects of their relationship.

Kelvin: Ah, now I didn't see the supplementary material, so that's interesting.

I think the scene with the two of them pretending to be father and son was supposed to show that underneath it all they do have affection for each other, but I don't know how successful it was.

Paul: Exactly!

That's a turning point scene, where Hal realizes that he's going to have to leave Falstaff behind, but it relied too much on the weepy music to make that point instead of letting the performances to the heavy lifting.

Kelvin: Yes. I'm a little torn on this film, because I think a lot of what they did with the little moments of truth and light and warmth struggling to the surface of all the misery was deliberate, but I wonder if they went a bit too far with the stifling grimness of it all.

And in doing so, undermined what they were trying to do.

Paul: This is a difficult film to review, you're right. I don't want my complaining to make it seem as though I didn't like the production. I actually really enjoyed it. It just wasn't what I was expecting, being at least a little more familiar with the play than I was with Richard II.

The performances are all superb, although I did think Hiddleston was a little stiff here and there. But that was mostly at the transitions between playing Hal the Prince and Hal the Blaggard.

Kelvin: I thought he was excellent, except in the moment when he decides to be the Prince; that was so unconvincing, I was waiting for an inserted line of dialogue to explain his change of heart.

It seemed like a scene had been cut somewhere.

Paul: I don't know. I think he relied a little too much on looking stern and then breaking out into that big smile to carry the transition in too many scenes.

Kelvin: It is an infectious smile!

Paul: I just kept seeing Loki.

Kelvin: That smile is forever associated with Loki in my mind now, too.

I was also impressed by his Jeremy Irons impression in the mock father and son scene. At first I thought they were doing some kind of trickery with a recording.

Paul: Oh yeah! That was a very good bit. It may be the best bit of work Hiddleston did in the whole play. It really felt natural; like he was having fun.

Kelvin: Yes, I appreciated that bit because they didn't have to go to the lengths of an impersonation; it was a little bit of extra, as you say, fun for the viewers.

Paul: Falstaff's overly poncy take on Hal was pretty entertaining there too.

Kelvin: Yes, he emphasised the "pretty boy" aspect of the character well there.

It was good, and was perhaps the only part where I was frustrated that they didn't do more with the comedic aspects of the play.

Because it was so good in that one scene.

Paul: Agreed.

Simon Russell Beale's Falstaff was excellent, if more restrained than normal interpretations. I would have loved to see him cut loose a little more. However, his serious ruminations on honor the night before the final battle of the play was fantastic.

Kelvin: Yes, he was very good, and in a difficult role, given the way they decided to play Falstaff.

I was reminded a lot of Robbie Coltrane, who played the character in Kenneth Branagh's Henry V.

Paul: Yes!

Kelvin: Which is not to take away from Beale's portrayal.

Paul: No!

I just realized that we've talked for quite a while now and neither of us have really mentioned Jeremy Irons or King Henry. For a play that is ostensibly about the man, he doesn't play that large a part of the production.

Kelvin: Indeed. I really like Jeremy Irons, but we didn't get to see him do much.

I mean, he was good enough, but I can't say I came away thinking "what a great performance by Jeremy Irons!"

Although he did carry the weariness of Henry very well.

Paul: He certainly did. I would have thought this play took place nearly twenty years after Richard II, not three.

Kelvin: Yes!

Again, it's one of those things that may have been deliberate. If you're trying to show a kingdom in decline, one way to do that is to show the figurehead as himself declining, perhaps by pushing him into the background. That said, you're still pushing one of the main characters into the background, so perhaps that's not the best approach.

Maybe I'm reading too much intent into the adaptation.

Paul: I was reading online about the play, and it turns out that originally the main focus was always on Henry IV and Falstaff. It was during the Twentieth Century that the arc that Prince Hal is on has become dominant in productions.

Kelvin: Yes, I read that too. It seems pertinent given our discussion both this week and last about how the plays can change depending on how little bits and pieces are tweaked.

Paul: Especially given your conspiracy theory of last week, too. Putting the focus on the legacy, rather than the decline in the build-up to the Olympics.

I really can't wait to see how they end Henry V.

Kelvin: Yes indeed. That's all about cheering on England, so one would expect it to be a celebratory finale, but you never know. Neither of the two films so far has gone as I expected.

Although to be fair, I knew very little about Richard II going in, so anything would have confounded my expectations.

Paul: There's a short epilogue to Henry V, where the Chorus comes out, thanks the audience, and mentions that Henry died young and his son lost everything he had gained. I don't know how that will play.

Kelvin: Yes indeed. They might cut it if it doesn't fit the arc they're going for, if indeed they're going for an arc!

What did you think of Joe Armstrong's Hotspur?

Paul: I was about to ask you the same thing! Again, I liked the performance. He was pretty much everything Hotspur is supposed to be. I also appreciated the fact that they cast his father, Alun Armstrong, as his father in the play.

Kelvin: Yes, I thought he did an excellent job. Both he and Hiddleston were positioned as these vibrant and energetic points of light amongst all the entropy, but I think Armstrong pulled it off a tad better than Loki did.

Paul: Yes, he did. I swear I've seen him in other things, but I can't find a single thing on his resume that I've seen. It's strange.

Kelvin: He was in the BBC's Robin Hood, alongside Harry Lloyd, who played Mortimer in this.

Paul: Yeah, but I've not watched any of that.

Anyway, it was a solid performance, and from what I understand, he did the accent properly, too (Thanks, Phil K.!).

Kelvin: Also, he looks very much like his dad, so you may be thinking of him!

Paul: That very well could be it. Especially as I didn't recognize his dad in this!

Kelvin: Look at Alun in The Duellists or the mighty Krull, and it could easily be Joe.

Paul: Oh shit! Those might be just the thing I was thinking about!

Kelvin: Well, everyone should watch both The Duellists and Krull, because they're ace.

Paul: Agreed.

So, do we want to talk about the whole Father/Son relationship theme in this, or was it all just too obvious to really mention?

Kelvin: It's worth a mention, at least. It's a key part of the play, after all.

Paul: And we should try to be professional and all that, I suppose.

Kelvin: I see no contradiction between professionalism and plugging Krull.

Paul: Oh no. No indeed. But plugging Krull and not mentioning the blatant point Shakespeare was making by opening the play with King Henry wishing Hotspur was his real son instead of the horrible disappointment that Hal was, and ending with the two young Henrys meeting on the field of battle with only one coming out alive, might be seen as missing something.

Kelvin: Yes, and also the surrogate father figure — however deficient — that Falstaff provides for Hal.

Paul: Yurp. It's all so bloody obvious, though. And a little boring. I wish it hadn't been thrust so front and center and instead they'd played more with the characters' motivations.

Kelvin: It is a bit obvious, yes, so much so that it didn't need the extra emphasis they put on it in this film, I agree.

And speaking of surrogates, the weird way Hotspur becomes fixated on his in-laws.

Paul: That was odd, I admit.

Also, given how close this play was chronologically with Richard II, I have to again second your wish from last week that each of these productions shared the same cast.

Kelvin: Yes, it seems like such a missed opportunity.

In particular, given how often this play refers to the events of the other, and to be shown a week after.

Paul: Did we see Hotspur in Richard II? I don't remember, but here he is always included with the others who welcomed Bolingbroke back into England from exile.

Kelvin: I don't believe we do see him.

Paul: I don't think so either.

Oh well. Can't have everything, I guess.

As it is, this is still a very impressive production. It was an interesting choice to play up the realism and lose the more boisterous comedy elements, but overall I think it accomplished what the director set out to do.

We'll have to see how next week's Part Two plays out to really judge, though, I'd think.

Kelvin: Yes indeed. I think that the film is in many ways quite brave in how it backs expectations of how the play should be performed. I don't think it was always successful, and it wasn't anywhere as impressive as Richard II was, but it had its own strengths; I very much appreciated the wintry tone of the whole thing, for example.

Paul: I know a lot of critics are calling this a high-point for television adaptations of Shakespeare, and while I agree it was a solid production, I don't know how it will hold up over time. The look and feel were excellent, as you say, but some of the lifeblood of the play seemed missing.

Kelvin: I suspect it's simply that it's been so long since we had any good TV adaptations that the critics are starved.

Paul: Ha!

Kelvin: The Macbeth from a couple of years ago was superb, the Richard II from last week was great, but this was just good.

Paul: Exactly. It was just good.

I can't decide whether to go with 3.5 stars or 4.

My gut says 3.5, but it was a beautiful production.

Kelvin: I'm going to go for , because I think the risks the creators made undermined the whole, in my opinion, no matter how much I liked the look of it.

Paul: I think you're right. it is.

I'm not nearly as familiar with Part Two as with Part One (which isn't saying much, really), so I'm very curious to see how this moves into the second half of Henry's reign.

Kelvin: Yes, there were clear indications that they see them as one long film, so I'm interested in how things progress.


Kelvin Green erupted fully formed from the grey shapeless mass of Ubbo Sathla in the dark days before humans walked the earth. He grew up on Judge Dredd, Transformers, Indiana Jones #12, the Avengers and Spider-Man, and thinks comics don't get much better than FLCL, Nextwave and Rocket Raccoon. Kelvin lives among garbage and seagulls and doesn't hate Marvel nearly as much as you all think he does.

Kelvin is also writing and illustrating the Lamentations of the Flame Princess RPG, Horror Among Thieves. You can contribute to the project, along with other LoTP games at indiegogo!


Paul Brian McCoy is the writer of Mondo Marvel and a regular contributor to Shot for Shot, Streaming Pile O' Wha?, and Classic Film/New Blu, all here at Comics Bulletin. His first novel, The Unraveling: Damaged Inc. Book One is on sale now for Kindle US, Kindle UK, and Nook. You can also purchase his collection of short stories, Coffee, Sex, & Creation at Amazon US and UK. He is unnaturally preoccupied with zombie films, Asian cult cinema, and sci-fi television. He can also be found babbling on Twitter at @PBMcCoy and blogging occasionally at Infernal Desire Machines.

Kelvin GreenPaul Brian McCoyThe Hollow Crown

Share On:
Tweet
SDCC Advance Review: 666 Park Avenue
SDCC Advance Review: Arrow

About The Author

Kelvin Green
Kelvin Green

Paul Brian McCoy is the Editor-in-Chief of Psycho Drive-In, writer of Mondo Marvel, and a regular contributor/editor for Comics Bulletin. His first novel, The Unraveling: Damaged Inc. Book One is available at Amazon US & UK, along with his collection of short stories, Coffee, Sex, & Creation (US & UK). He recently contributed the 1989 chapter to The American Comic Book Chronicles: The 1980s (US & UK) and has kicked off Comics Bulletin Books with Mondo Marvel Volumes One (US & UK) and Two (US & UK). Paul is unnaturally preoccupied with zombie films, Asian cult cinema, and sci-fi television. He can also be found babbling on Twitter at @PBMcCoy.

Related Posts

  • “The Long, Strange Trip of Deathlok the Demolisher”

    Paul Brian McCoy
    May 22, 2017
  • 4.0

    What We Said Then: Sunday Slugfest – Infinite Crisis #1

    Keith Dallas
    April 5, 2015

Latest Reviews

  • 2.0

    Review: Roku #1 Fails to Deliver

    Jason Jeffords Jr.
    November 11, 2019
  • 3.5

    Review: AMAZING MARY JANE #1 Starts Strong But Plays it Safe With Messaging

    Daniel Gehen
    October 29, 2019
  • 4.0

    Review: Count Crowley – Reluctant Midnight Monster Hunter #1

    Mike Nickells
    October 22, 2019
  • 4.5

    Review: Superman Smashes the Klan #1

    Daniel Gehen
    October 17, 2019
  • 4.5

    Review: X-MEN #1 – The Good Times are Here

    Jason Jeffords Jr.
    October 17, 2019
  • 4.5

    Comictober 2019: Hillbilly Volume 1 TPB

    Mike Nickells
    October 14, 2019
  • 3.0

    Review: Ruby Falls #1 Combines Mystery With Tragic Mental Illness

    Daniel Gehen
    October 8, 2019
  • 4.5

    Review: COFFIN BOUND #3 Takes a Dark Trip Through Memory Lane

    Jason Jeffords Jr.
    October 8, 2019
  • Singles Going Steady – Welcome Aboard Edition!

    Daniel Gehen, Mike Nickells
    October 1, 2019
  • 4.0

    Review: HARLEEN #1 Sets Up a Tragic Descent into Madness

    Daniel Gehen
    September 26, 2019
RSSTwitterFacebookgoogleplusinstagramtumblr

Comics Bulletin is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, audible.com, and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate, Comics Bulletin earns from qualifying purchases.

All content on this site (c) 2018 The Respective Copyright Holders