Comics Bulletin logo
Search
  • Columns
    Random
    • PAX Prime 2011: Day 1

      Shawn Hill
      August 27, 2011
      Columns
    Recent
    • Revisiting the Witchblade/Fathom/Tomb Raider Crossover

      Daniel Gehen
      February 8, 2021
    • The Full Run: Usagi Yojimbo – The Wanderer’s Road Part 2

      Daniel Gehen
      December 4, 2020
    • The Full Run: Usagi Yojimbo – The Wanderer’s Road Part 1

      Daniel Gehen
      October 30, 2020
    • What Looks Good
    • Comics Bulletin Soapbox
    • The Full Run
    • Leading Question
    • Top 10
    • The Long-Form
    • Jumping On
    • Comics in Color
    • Slouches Towards Comics
  • Big Two
    Random
    • Collecting Profile: Magik in New Mutants

      Shawn Hill
      January 18, 2020
      Big Two, Collectibles, Marvel Comics, Miscellaneous Comic Book Content
    Recent
    • Collecting Profile: 6 Most Expensive Comic Books April 2021 Update

      nguyen ly
      April 17, 2021
    • 3.0

      Review: X-MEN LEGENDS #1 Delivers A Dose of Nostalgia

      Daniel Gehen
      February 22, 2021
    • 4.5

      DCeased: Dead Planet #7 Presents a Hopeful Future (Review)

      Daniel Gehen
      January 22, 2021
    • DC Comics
    • Big Two Reviews
    • Marvel Comics
  • Indie
    Random
    • Mignola and Hughes Reunite for An All New HELLBOY & THE B.P.R.D Story

      Shawn Hill
      August 27, 2019
      Dark Horse, News, Press Release
    Recent
    • 4.0

      Review: Beast Wars #2 another chance to change the past

      Stephen Cook
      March 3, 2021
    • 4.5

      Review: THE LAST RONIN #2 Hurts So Good

      Daniel Gehen
      February 19, 2021
    • TIME BEFORE TIME—A HIGH STAKES TIME TRAVEL SCIENCE FICTION SERIES SET TO LAUNCH THIS MAY

      Daniel Gehen
      February 19, 2021
    • Reviews
    • Archie Comics
    • Boom! Studios
    • Dark Horse
    • IDW
    • Image
    • Oni Press
    • Valiant
  • Reviews
    Random
    • Singles Going Steady 4/26/2017: Stunners, Brainbusters, and The Button

      Shawn Hill
      May 1, 2017
      Big Two, Black Mask, Boom! Studios, DC Comics, Indie, Reviews, Singles Going Steady
    Recent
    • Singles Going Steady – Vowels, Who Needs Them?

      Daniel Gehen
      March 8, 2021
    • 3.0

      Review: X-MEN LEGENDS #1 Delivers A Dose of Nostalgia

      Daniel Gehen
      February 22, 2021
    • 4.5

      Review: THE LAST RONIN #2 Hurts So Good

      Daniel Gehen
      February 19, 2021
    • Singles Going Steady
    • Slugfest
    • Manga
      • Reviews
    • Small Press
      • Reviews
      • ICYMI
      • Tiny Pages Made of Ashes
  • Interviews
    Random
    • Interview: Steve Orlando and Doing Things That Don't Make Sense for Family

      Shawn Hill
      November 15, 2016
      Boom! Studios, Indie, Interviews
    Recent
    • Interview: Jon Davis-Hunt Talks SHADOWMAN

      Daniel Gehen
      June 8, 2020
    • Interview: Becky Cloonan talks DARK AGNES and Her Personal Influences

      Mike Nickells
      March 4, 2020
    • Simon Roy

      Interview: Simon Roy on His Inspirations and Collaborations on PROTECTOR

      Mike Nickells
      January 29, 2020
    • Audio Interview
    • Video Interview
  • Classic Comics
    Random
    • Classic Comics Cavalcade: Death Is What Happens While You’re Making Other Plans: The Exiles Pt. 1

      Shawn Hill
      May 29, 2015
      Classic Comics Cavalcade, Columns
    Recent
    • VISITOR is the Quintessential “SPIRIT” Story

      Daniel Gehen
      March 26, 2021
    • Countdown to the King: Marvel’s Godzilla

      Daniel Gehen
      May 29, 2019
    • Honoring A Legend: Fantagraphics To Resurrect Tomi Ungerer Classics

      Daniel Gehen
      February 15, 2019
    • Classic Comics Cavalcade
    • Classic Interviews
  • News
    Random
    • FIRST LOOK: I MOVED TO LOS ANGELES TO WORK IN ANIMATION

      Shawn Hill
      October 20, 2018
      Boom! Studios, News, Press Release
    Recent
    • TIME BEFORE TIME—A HIGH STAKES TIME TRAVEL SCIENCE FICTION SERIES SET TO LAUNCH THIS MAY

      Daniel Gehen
      February 19, 2021
    • Image Comics and TMP Announces SPAWN’S UNIVERSE

      Daniel Gehen
      February 18, 2021
    • SAVAGE DRAGON IS A FORCE TO BE RECKONED WITH THIS MAY

      Daniel Gehen
      February 17, 2021
    • Press Release
    • Kickstarter Spotlight
  • Books
    Random
    • 5.0

      RED ROSA: A Graphic Biography of Rosa Luxemburg

      Shawn Hill
      October 26, 2015
      Books, Reviews
    Recent
    • Collecting Profile: Disney Frozen

      CB Staff
      November 22, 2019
    • Collecting Profile: NFL Superpro

      CB Staff
      August 31, 2019
    • “THE BEST OF WITZEND” is a Wonderful Celebration of Artistic Freedom

      Daniel Gehen
      September 15, 2018
    • Review: ‘Machete Squad’ is a Disappointing Afghan Memoir

      Jason Sacks
      July 31, 2018
    • Review: ‘Out of Nothing’ is the Antidote to Our Sick Times

      Jason Sacks
      July 23, 2018
    • Review: ‘Bizarre Romance’ Shows Rough Edges in the Early Days of a New Marriage

      Jason Sacks
      July 10, 2018
What's New
  • Collecting Profile: 6 Most Expensive Comic Books April 2021 Update
  • Collecting Profile: Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Collecting Profile: 1990 Marvel Universe Trading Cards
  • Collecting Profile: Red Sonja
  • Collecting Profile: Dr. Doom
  • VISITOR is the Quintessential “SPIRIT” Story
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Contact Us
  • Write for us!
  • Visit Video Game Break!
Home
Reviews

Real Talk: Invincible #100

Shawn Hill
February 6, 2013
Reviews, Team-Up Review

Some comics are too big, hypeworthy or insane for one reviewer to cover. Which is why we have Real Talk, an outlet for a group of reviewers to tackle a comic together and either come to a consensus or verbally arm wrestle until there's nothing left to say.

 

Shawn Hill: I got the Invincible #100 cover by Arthur Adams, where the Grim Reaper decides Mark Grayson's number is up. Which it has been time and time before. But we should know by now, that trick never works. Robert Kirkman's already done the horrible carnage of the Viltrumite War. He's less interested in revisiting that approach, so the grossest thing that happens this issue is "Mark's" eyeball popping towards the camera as Dinosaurus squishes his head. This is the very next frame from last issue's cliffhanger, where he starts to apply pressure.

The next splash page is one of those spreads of thousands of faces and their shocked reactions (since Dinosaurus is purposefully playing to the cameras). I was looking for some of Mark's foes at least to be gleefully happy, but no, we even get a certain very concerned-looking Daily Planet reporter.

The first of the three-parter was about endangering Los Angeles, the second was about flooding many major world coastal cities (does Paris really qualify, by the  way? It's pretty far from the beach — it's just cool to see the Eiffel Tower submerged I guess); the finale is about fixing the damage, which isn't as bad as the title implies. As Kirkman says in the letters page, he's been playing with fan expectations purposefully since killing Zandale's parents in #97; I think he's doing it again here in the opposite way, by holding back on the promised destruction.

 

 

Jason Sacks: Yeah, you're absolutely right, Shawn. This issue is all about Robert Kirkman going against fan expectations, zigging again and again when we expect a zag. From the results of Dinosaurus squishing "Mark's" head to the ultimate confrontation between hero and villain; from the resolution of the flooding plotline to the new final-page cliffhanger, Kirkman seems to deliberately playing against reader expectations. 

Unfortunately, I'm not sure that Kirkman wasn't too clever for his own good.

His story goes so far out of its way to defy expectations that at times it feels abrupt, too convinced of its own cleverness and oddly small world view. In the most frustrating way possible, this story felt comic-booky, like a mid-'70s Marvel comic full of clones and quickly-dismissed destruction and a sense that no matter how things change, the status quo for any superhero strip never really changes in a major way. 

That gives this anniversary issue a strange sort of retro-feel to it. I know that seems strange to say about a comic that starts with a character's skull literally crushed by an evil arch-villain, blood spattered everywhere, but in a way that's the point: it feels like Robert Kirkman is treating Invincible as a place to indulge his retro-storytelling passions. And while there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, it's hard for me to escape the feeling that the results of those passions is somehow less satisfying than what Kirkman was aspiring to create.

Or am I kind of missing the point, Shawn?

 

 

Shawn: Not missing the point so much as … wanting something else? I agree with you that this is a book where Kirkman indulges himself completely. There's definitely a (slightly immature) tone of "It's my book, I can do what I want." Invincible indulges his "retro-storytelling passions" just like Savage Dragon does for Larsen.

But I liked most of what he did this issue.

Mark has tried defying Cecil. He's tried going his own way. He's tried running his super hero career as a business. The most he's accomplished is turning Las Vegas into a sheet of glass. He's not as wise as Cecil. But he's become a lot smarter than he was, and that's due to his failures. So though it may seem everything's back to a reset status again with this issue. Mark's back in the employ of the government (but now as an alternative to incarceration). There will be no remaking of the world (except that's already happened, with Robot's two artificial moons now controlling our tides; Ottley earned his pay with their designs alone this issue) a la the apocalyptic plans of Dinosaurus. 

Was it too easy, the way Dinosaurus just finally at long last saw how much of a god complex he had? Mark had been trying to bash that point into his head since the beginning. We didn't see the execution, but we certainly saw gallons of blood pouring over a very defeated and guilty Invincible. Does Dinosaurus really deserve any sort of more noble demise?

Mark is still a Viltrumite, no matter what, but he's one that's capable of learning and growing and not acting for only his own interests (as the rest of them do). And now he's on the road of becoming a family man himself. 

We may have an old word order in place again, but this Invincible is a changed man. And he's going to keep evolving. So are we interested in permanent change as its own reward, or change as an evolution on a spectrum of possibilities? I read my ongoing series not hoping for an ending, but I'm ready to enjoy the changed playing field. 

 

 

Jason: Of course, Kirkman has done this sort of thing before, with the conclusion of the Villtrumite War storyline resulting in a kind of anticlimax that felt both to me both satisfying and unsatisfying at the same time, if that makes any sort of sense. The conclusion of that story succeeded in subverting user expectations, of taking the high road of the intellectually pleasing resolution over the lower road of the more action-oriented conclusion. I think the history of this series has shown that Kirkman made the right choice by having the Viltrumite invaders come to an epiphany about their plans.

That sort of conclusion is also on display here, where we essentially see Mark win a long philosophical argument with Dinosaurus, an argument that ends in the most conclusive way possible with Mark leaving Dinosaurus' lair, blood trailing behind our hero. As you say, Shawn, Mark has Viltrumite blood in his veins, but he's capable of learning and growing and fighting the need to always have a battle provide the resolution for a conflict.

I get that, and I really like that.

But that doesn't make this issue any less frustr
ating for me. Unlike the end of the Viltrumite War storyline (which I have to admit I kind of hated at the time), there's no sense of consequences for any of the characters here. I expected to see Mark tortured a bit by his decisions and the world having trouble recovering from the deaths of a million people. Instead, we get a reset to the status quo — or so it seems to me. 

You ask, "Are we interested in permanent change as its own reward, or change as an evolution on a spectrum of possibilities?" This makes me question my biases here: as a reader more of graphic novels than single issues, am I expecting too much from this resolution?

 

Hill: Well, I'm a reader of the issues. So I dunno. I just realized while writing this that he often gives the trades titles from old sitcoms. But the world is only recovering from the deaths of thousands of people. Basically, Katrina happened to several major cities (or maybe it was more like Sandy in some cases), and the heroes were there to mop up and save lives. Dinosaurus' global view was the wrong approach. Mark's maybe is not as dramatic, but isn't a good outcome geared towards public safety more realistic in a world with global peacekeepers who see themselves more like the JLA than the Authority?

Compared to the Viltrumite War, what we ended up with were sleeper cells of aliens on earth who will obviously activate at some later point in Kirkman's plans. For issue #100, we've got Mark back on a Global Defense team. For an ongoing title, I find those kinds of twists to signify continued invention, not delays or anticlimaxes. It's not whether you cycle around to a reset sometimes that matters, it's how you get there.

Sacks: I'm stuck with what may be an irrational feeling in my gut that Invincible #100 is an anticlimax, that the most important scenes happen off stage or feel anti-climactic or just basically feel like a mismatch for the intensity of the events that are depicted in this issue. Am I being short-sighted? Am I selling Kirkman short? Maybe so.

Let the debate continue in the comments!


Shawn Hill knows two things: comics and art history. Find his art at Cornekopia.net.

 


Jason Sacks is Publisher of Comics Bulletin. Follow him at @jasonsacks, email him at jason.sacks@comicsbulletin.com or friend him on Facebook.

ImageInvincibleJason SacksJohn RauchRobert KirkmanRyan OttleyShawn Hill

Share On:
Tweet
X-Wing: January 2013
Two For #1: January 2013

About The Author

Shawn Hill
Publisher Emeritus

Jason Sacks has been obsessed with pop culture for longer than he'd like to remember. Jason has been writing for Comics Bulletin for nearly a decade, producing over a million words of content about comics, films and other media. He has also been published in a number of publications, including the late, lamented Amazing Heroes, The Flash Companion and The American Comic Book Chronicles: the 1970s and 1980s. Find him on Facebook and Twitter. Jason is the Owner and Publisher of Comics Bulletin.

Related Posts

  • 4.5

    Micro Review: Commanders in Crisis #1

    Jason Jeffords Jr.
    October 12, 2020
  • Collecting Profile: Thief of Thieves

    nguyen ly
    August 15, 2020

Latest Reviews

  • Singles Going Steady – Vowels, Who Needs Them?

    Daniel Gehen
    March 8, 2021
  • 3.0

    Review: X-MEN LEGENDS #1 Delivers A Dose of Nostalgia

    Daniel Gehen
    February 22, 2021
  • 4.5

    Review: THE LAST RONIN #2 Hurts So Good

    Daniel Gehen
    February 19, 2021
  • 2.3

    Review: SAVAGE #1 Needs Taming

    Daniel Gehen
    February 16, 2021
  • 4.3

    Review: RADIANT BLACK #1 Shines Brightly

    Daniel Gehen
    February 12, 2021
  • 2.7

    Review: DEEP BEYOND #1 Can’t Commit to a Premise

    Daniel Gehen
    February 4, 2021
  • 2.0

    VINDICATION Falls Short of its Lofty Goals (Review)

    Daniel Gehen
    February 1, 2021
  • 4.5

    DCeased: Dead Planet #7 Presents a Hopeful Future (Review)

    Daniel Gehen
    January 22, 2021
  • Review: The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Cartoonist

    Daniel Gehen
    December 14, 2020
  • Retro Review: Detective Comics #826 Remains a Holiday Classic

    Daniel Gehen
    December 3, 2020
RSSTwitterFacebookgoogleplusinstagramtumblr

Comics Bulletin is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, audible.com, and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate, Comics Bulletin earns from qualifying purchases.

All content on this site (c) 2018 The Respective Copyright Holders