

OR

Writer: Robert Kirkman
Artists: various
Publisher: Image Comics
I’m disappointed in this issue yet it’s not put a foot wrong; the paradox here is that Invincible #25 is every bit as good as any other issue (which is to say, very good indeed - Kirkman has all the characterisation skills of Bendis and none of the bad pacing and verbal diarrhoea, and the art is superb), it’s every bit as fun and exciting as I expected..., and yet I’m nonplussed.
The problem, I think, is something quite external to this comic. I think the problem is the very concept of the anniversary issue; I’ve been trained to expect something big and exciting and unusual for such an event, a break from the established norm, and what we get instead is just your average issue of Invincible. It’s great stuff, but aside from a killer cliffhanger (and even that is business as usual for Kirkman), this issue just doesn’t have the Wow! Factor a #25 should have; there are some bonus back-up features but as well put-together as they are, they still feel like filler, due mostly to the bitty and incomplete feel they all share. Most are origin stories for members of the Invincible supporting cast, but in each case, they fall short of telling the whole story; they feel like episodes in an anthology title, except less satisfying as we can expect the next installments no earlier than in another twenty-five months. As good as the back-ups are (and I’ll be predictable and pick Science Dog as my favourite), I’d have preferred a double-sized main feature.
So is it fair to mark this down for not delivering on expectations engendered by business practices elsewhere in the comics industry? Is it churlish to complain that the bonus features aren’t quite up to snuff given that they are bonus features and the creators were under no obligation to produce them? For all my years of studying esoteric principles of philosophy, I confess that I don’t know; so this comic gets


What did you think of this book?
Have your say at the Line of Fire Forum!